• Member Since 31st Mar, 2012
  • offline last seen Aug 24th, 2020

Piquo Pie


I love psychology and writing. I tend to write origional/experimental stories. I am the head of the School for New Writers and the EFNW writing track. My new favorite quote is "Why so ˈsir-ē-əs?"

More Blog Posts173

Jul
12th
2015

Personality or Ponyality? Just one of those dumb question you find yourself with. · 9:36am Jul 12th, 2015

Honestly, I think I just blew my own mind.

We call it personality because it's the reality of a person's being. But for mlp should it be ponyality because it's the reality of a pony's being?

This gets into the whole should ponies even call themselves people debate, which has multiple arguments that DO NOT NEED TO BE DISCUSSED but the question remains, should it be tied to whether they call themselves people or not? Maybe it's to nebulous of a concept to ponify. I mean, it's not like handshake -> hoofshake.

GAH! I have more productive things to be doing.

Comments ( 7 )

Well... it's hard to say without going into the "ponies = people" debate, but... "people" is the plural of "person", so yes, if ponies are people, then they have a personality.

Personally, the word that always trips me up is "manually". :)

3230699

Lol, stallionly, hoofily, magically... wait a minute.

I thought the same thing for persona, but I don't think person is a word that needs to be translated.

I think that ponies would refer to any sentient (nonspecific) race as "people." This becomes important when addressing a mixed crowd of ponies, buffalo, and griffins to avoid giving offense. So any derivatives of the word should be fine.

I think it often depends on how well it flows in speech for whether certain things are changed.

It's easy to say "hoofing" for "footing," but not as easy a parallel to say "that'll come in hoofy" rather than "handy." For bad translations like that, I tend to work my way around that phrase. I.E. "That'll be useful."

Login or register to comment