The Life series of nature documentaries continues on Equus. Join Sir David Attenborough as he follows the adventures of 'Rook', a Miniequus pastelhorsei, in her native environment.
Tied for third place in the Cozy Glow group's 4th annual contest. Prompt: Cozy Glow vs. Sir David Attenborough.
Of note, this work is not intended to make light of Sir David Attenborough, who remains a British national treasure even though he hates being called that.
Conspiracy theory: Celestia is using Tartarus as a way to both get rid of creatures she doesn't want and a way to weaken humanity by unleashing monsters on our world!!
Who is Sir David Attenborough?
11704706
Famous British nature documentary narrator and producer on the BBC.
11704706
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Attenborough
Why not both? :p
BUT I WANNA LIKE IT!
Meanwhile, at Cheyenne Mountain...
O'Neill: Daniel, have you had any luck figuring out pony talk?
Jackson: I think I know what they are saying. But if any Human can speak it? That is still a big question mark, Jack.
O'Neill: Well, keep trying.
Every pony is now going to want their own human pet for perpetual headscritches.
As one of your editors I must advise you to consider that sledgehammer.
11705077
You could probably win next year's contest with a Cozy Glow sledgehammer fic. That's more in line with what the judges are looking for than this.
11705635 cozy was so cute in it's i love nature documentaries and cozy glow so having them together so thank you
i dislike fox news when it comes to it
11707163
You're welcome, and thank you!
11707483 your welcome
Okay, I know this is meant to be a parody, but Fox News does not act like this at all.
Now, how Earth would react to the existence of Equestria is up to anyone's imagination, but somehow I don't think this would be it.
It's not really CNN unless they find some way to make this all Trump's fault.
This is the same Fox News that settled out of court for $787,500,000 for knowingly making false statements about Dominion Voting Systems (regarding election fraud) and then retracted those false statements on air as part of the settlement. Internal Fox documents proved the network knew what they were broadcasting was false (which would make it fake news).
Their defense was they were stating opinions (reminder, this is supposedly a 'news' channel, not an 'opinion' channel). It turns out opinions aren't news, and false statements are still considered slander. Fox News: For entertainment purposes only. Not to be taken seriously. At all.
Just because something is a parody doesn't mean there isn't truth behind the humor.